The Folly of the Israeli AND Arab Approach to Iran
By Alan Hart
¯ Netanyahu told a group of editors in Tel Aviv that }Israel has not been damaged at all by the Wikileaks publications.~ A senior Israeli government official went further in his response to questions from AFP. He said: }We have come out looking good.~ The leaked documents, he added, }confirm that the whole Middle East is terrified by the prospect of a nuclear Iran… The Arab countries are pushing the United States towards military action more forcefully than Israel.~
¯ Zbigniew Brzezinski, President Carter’s National Security Advisor, thinks that Wikileaks is being manipulated by intelligence services. He said so in an interview with PBS’s Judy Woodruff and also in a subsequent BBC World Service (Radio) interview. To Judy Woodruff he said:
}The real issue is, who is feeding Wikileaks? They’re getting a lot of information which seems trivial, inconsequential, but some of it seems surprisingly pointed… The very pointed references to Arab leaders could have as their objective undermining their political credibility at home, because this kind of public identification of their hostility towards Iran could actually play against them at home…It’s a question of whether Wikileaks are being manipulated by interested parties that want to either complicate our relationship with other governments or want to undermine some governments… I have no doubt that Wikileaks is getting a lot of the stuff from sort of relatively unimportant sources, like the one that perhaps is identified on the air. But it may be getting stuff at the same time from interested intelligence parties who want to manipulate the process and achieve certain very specific objectives.~
¯ Which party benefited most from the first two days of Wikileaks revelations? The obvious answer is the Zionist state of Israel.
ليست هناك تعليقات:
إرسال تعليق